Arizona Game and FIsh Department - Managing Today for Wildlife Tomorrow: Arizona Game and Fish Department
Operation Game Thief: 1-800-352-0700Customer Service
    Follow AZGFD on Twitter  

Game and Fish Commission votes to support alternative on Mexican wolf conservation developed by large stakeholder partnership

Posted in: News Media
Apr 22, 2014
Share or Bookmark:
| More
Digg this story!

Printer friendly page

The Arizona Game and Fish Commission voted unanimously today to support an alternative developed by 29 cooperating agencies and stakeholders for the non-essential population rule that governs Mexican wolf conservation in Arizona and New Mexico. The proposal, which has an unprecedented level of stakeholder support, is being submitted to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) for consideration in its Environmental Impact Statement (EIS).
While still conceptual, the alternative is scientifically-based and would further cooperation between federal and state agencies and stakeholders to achieve a self-sustaining wolf population. Key elements of the alternative include:
  • Allowing up to triple the target number of Mexican wolves in the Southwest from the 1982 recovery plan’s goal of not less than 100 wolves to achieve a self-sustaining population.
  • Major expansion of the area where wolves can be released to include the Secondary Recovery Zone.
  • Expansion of the area where Mexican wolves can disperse and establish territories.
  • Establishment of a connectivity corridor for wolves to disperse to the species’ core historical range in Mexico. 
  • Recognition of the importance of Mexico as a primary element to successful Mexican wolf recovery.

“The biggest impediment to the Mexican wolf reintroduction effort in the Southwest isn’t biologically-based. It’s social tolerance for an apex predator on today’s modern landscape that must support such a wide variety of conservation, recreation and economic uses. This alternative represents the first time such a broad-based group has come together for Mexican wolf conservation, and it goes a long ways to enhancing social tolerance and, in turn, successful conservation of the species,” says J.W. Harris, chairman of the Arizona Game and Fish Commission.
The alternative provides concepts that stakeholders want the Service to evaluate as it prepares the draft EIS that will eventually be opened to broad public review and comment.


The cooperating agencies and stakeholders supporting this alternative are as follows:

Cooperating Agencies

Arizona Game and Fish Department
Eastern Arizona Counties Organization
Gila County (AZ)
Graham County (AZ)
Greenlee County (AZ)
Navajo County (AZ)
Stakeholders Supporting this Alternative as a Starting Point for Further Discussion

Anglers United
Arizona Antelope Foundation
Arizona BASS
Arizona Big Game Super Raffle
Arizona Cattle Growers’ Association
Arizona Chapter of the National Wild Turkey Federation
Arizona Deer Association
Arizona Desert Bighorn Sheep Society
Arizona Elk Society
Arizona Houndsmen
Arizona Sportsmen for Wildlife Conservation
Arizona Trappers Association
Arizona Wildlife Federation
Big Game Forever
ES Advisement, LLC (AZ)
Coconino Sportsmen
Outdoor Experience 4 All
Phoenix Varmint Callers, Inc.
Sportsmen’s Constituent Group
The BASS Federation
The Mule Deer Foundation
Yuma Valley Rod & Gun Club

  Share or Bookmark:
| More


Add this site to...

Mission | Customer Service | Web Policy | Send Comments | Employment | Commission Agenda | Office Locations | Site Map | Search | © 2008 AZGFD